Everything Woman











{February 14, 2008}   50 Reasons LOTR movies sucked

This came to me via Cracked.


  1. Crass Marketing.

    I’ve heard some students are being forced to read some novelization of the movies in their literature classes. Ridiculous. Does Hollywood run our classrooms now?

  2. Greed.

    Hollywood can’t make a movie these days without crapping out a sequel the next year to squeeze more cash out of the proverbial sheep. After Two Towers made its money, did anyone doubt Rocky would come out of retirement one more time?

  3. Quality Control at New Line.

    Millions of copies of the LOTR DVDs have thick black bars at the bottom and top of the screen throughout the film. Didn’t anyone catch this? You know what happens at the end, in the extreme foreground and extreme upper sky? Neither do I. Bush league, gentlemen.

  4. They switched Darrens on us!

    Look closely in Fellowship and you’ll notice the human member of their party is played by two different actors at different points of the movie (it takes a sharp eye to notice, but one of them has red hair, one black).

  5. Quality Control at New Line, II.

    In the massive Mt. Doom battle scene at the beginning of Fellowship of the Ring, a DVD pause reveals at least half a dozen of the 50,000 Orc Warrior extras are wearing modern tennis shoes.

  6. Speaking of Orcs…

    The Orcs were obviously stolen from PC game maker Blizzard and its Warcraft series. Too bad Blizzard is apparently too scared to sue New Line over it.

  7. Racism.

    Percentage of protagonists in Fellowship who are white: 100. Meanwhile the black-skinned antagonists and their black crow spies and their black glass seeing ball inhabit their black towers and perform black magic. One would have to be blind to miss the symbolism.

  8. Gold: The Stretchy Element.

    The ring, which is seen to be at least two inches in diameter at the beginning to fit the polish sausage-sized finger of Sauron, suddenly fits Frodo’s child-sized finger later. I guess this movie takes place in a world where rings magically change sizes on their own.

  9. Violence.

    Give me one reason that story couldn’t have been told without all the fighting.

  10. Horse sense.

    Why didn’t they take horses on their quest? Or even better, why didn’t Gandalf’s giant flying bird friend haul them into Mordor? Watch out, Frodo! All of your methods of transportation have been swallowed by the Dark Lord of the Plot Hole!

  11. Retracted.*

    See below.

  12. Return of the Living Dead.

    In FOTR, if you watch closely during the Inn scene, Frodo and his crew are shown getting stabbed by the Ring Wraiths. Then, five seconds later, they are fine again. Note to the director: try proofreading your movie before you release it to the public.

  13. Did someone say plot hole?

    Liv Tyler’s character is seen easily defeating nine strong supernatural beings, even though she is clearly a woman.

  14. The Battle Droid Syndrome.

    The mutated muscular soldiers of Mordor turned out to be hilariously ineffective fighters, a dozen of them held off by a single dying human. Apparently they made the beasts by crossing Orcs, Goblins and the French.

  15. Sloppy CGI.

    Gandalf’s smoke boat at Bilbo’s party is pretty impressive, but smoke cannot be made to travel horizontally, thus revealing it to be nothing but a cheap special effect.

  16. The Asbestos Wizard.

    We all saw Gandalf fall into the molten core of Middle Earth after his battle with the firebeast thing in part 1. Well, I guess the Gandalf action figure must have sold well, because in the slap-together sequel Two Towers, Gandalf is back. Perhaps it was voodoo, a la the corpse in Weekend at Bernie’s II (look closely and you’ll notice LOTR steals several elements from the WaB films).

  17. Invisible Implausibility.

    Every time Frodo or Bilbo went invisible with the ring they should have also gone BLIND. Your eyes cannot function unless light is reflected off the cornea. If light passes through it (as must be the case with invisibility) sight is no longer possible. Also, rings do not turn you invisible.

  18. The Asbestos Wizard, II.

    The giant fire beast thing at the end of part 1 was breathing a firey breath hot enough to send heat-distortion waves through the air. The sheer temperature of the air should have burned off Gandalf’s beard and eyebrows. None of my reading on evolutionary biology reveals a single reason why a particular race of humans would develop unflammable facial hair as this would provide practically no advantage in either survival or mating.

  19. I’ll have to rent that one.

    The rushed-through story the screenwriter threw in as the first ten minutes of Fellowship of the Ring looked a lot more interesting than the movie we were forced to watch. Why didn’t somebody make a movie off that instead?

  20. Magic Mechanics.

    Experts on the occult say in order for a wizard to floorspin a fully-grown man like Gandalf, he’d need three magical staffs, not two.

  21. Finders, keepers.

    So Bilbo, who we are supposed to identify with as a protagonist, finds a piece of someone else’s jewelry and just keeps it for himself? That’s funny, because I would expect a good man to submit it to the local Lost and Found so it could be claimed by its owner. It makes me wonder if he bought that hillside house or if he was just squatting.

  22. Go-Go Gadget Arrow Sprouter.

    Legolas shoots arrow after arrow at his enemies, and yet the number of arrows in his quiver never decreases. I guess elves have glands on their back that secrete arrows.

  23. Watch out! He’s going to explode!

    The heroes are shown eating again and again, and yet no one ever goes to the bathroom throughout their entire quest.

  24. Meesa gonna make theesa movie suckah!

    The character of Gollum in The Two Towers was entirely computer animated (a cheap effort to cash in on 1999’s Jar Jar Binks Mania) but was just a dim shadow of George Lucas’ effort. Thank you, Peter Jackson. Thank you right to Hell.

  25. Propaganda.

    The Elves, clearly the most advanced and wise species, are also clearly gay.

  26. Speaking of Elves…

    Elves are beautiful and wise and tall? Great warriors? Makers of fine lightweight weapons? Our modern knowledge of elves has observed only an ability to make cookies and toys. All the elves in the film are portrayed as living in a warm paradise (Rivendell) but our own information tells us the aforementioned group of toymaking elves work and thrive in the arctic. Hey, Mr. Jackson: Research is half of writing.

  27. Homage or theft?

    The “happy village of little people” idea was stolen from Willow.

  28. Homage or theft II?

    The wise old wizard character was stolen from Harry Potter.

  29. Homage or theft III?

    The “travelling on our quest through a corn field” scene was stolen from Shrek.

  30. Homage or theft IV?

    The character of the rebellious-but-helpful Ranger was stolen from Val Kilmer in Willow.

  31. Homage or theft V?

    The concept of the violent dwarf was based on Al Pacino.

  32. Homage or theft VI?

    The “old man looking through the door hatch at the approaching little people” scene was stolen from A Clockwork Orange.

  33. Homage or theft VII?

    The cantina scene with a noisy bar filled with a mix of otherworldly species was stolen from Cecile B. DeMille’s One Night in an Alien Bar.

  34. Homage or theft VIII?

    The incident with the flock of evil magical spying crows serving the All-Seeing Eye was based on an actual incident.

  35. Homage or theft IX?

    The character of the Giant Evil Flaming All-Seeing Eye was based on former President Jimmy Carter.

  36. Homage or theft X?

    The character of Elrond was based on Agent Smith from The Matrix.

  37. Weighty issues.

    AKA “Plot Hole No. 273.” Even with all that walking and light eating, the character of Sam only got fatter.

  38. Realism, schmealism.

    Liv Tyler’s immortal elf volunteers to give up her eternal life for a single romance with a human man. Could any man really be that well endowed? I find it unlikely.

  39. Hair Today, Gone Tomorrow.

    The most advanced civilization is that of the elves, which are long-haired, new-age types? Sorry, Mr. Jackson, but modern science has proven that in any modern civilization, hippies would be extinct.

  40. Too many notes.

    No movie should be over two hours long. Did we need that whole thing in the mine in part 1? What about that almost-infinite battle scene in part 2? Didn’t it seem like they were just adding pointless scenes in the middle to pad it? It’s like they decided beforehand they wanted three hours for each film and used filler to flesh them out.

  41. Too many notes, II.

    I just want to re-emphasize the above point. There is no reason entertainment can’t be concise.

  42. Too many notes, III.

    Too many characters to keep track of. The dwarf was clearly only there as a token dwarf character to sell tickets to lucrative movie-going dwarf demographic. Lose him.

  43. Rationalization for violence.

    Why, in part 1, is the black octopus creature painted as the bad guy when it attacks, when one of the fellowship had clearly been throwing rocks at it?

  44. The Shoeless Land.

    The Hobbits both 1) refuse to wear shoes and 2) run a livestock-based farming economy. Wouldn’t they constantly be stepping in feces? Why doesn’t the movie address this issue?

  45. Casting.

    Why couldn’t Frodo have been played by Christopher Walken?

  46. Casting, II.

    Why couldn’t Gandalf have been played by Bruce Campbell?

  47. Casting, III.

    Why couldn’t Bilbo have been played by Vin Diesel?

  48. Casting, IV.

    Why couldn’t Aragorn have been played by a monkey?

  49. The Score.

    The background music nearly zero funk.

  50. What’s that smell?

    As bad as the Lucasfilm internet leaks were with the last Star Wars trilogy, the filmmakers of Lord of the Rings allowed the paperback novelizations onto shelves years in advance As if we needed any less of a reason to go see it.

*RETRACTED REASONS LORD OF THE RINGS SUCKS:

11. Damn you, gravity!

The giant firebeast thing is defeated by Gandalf when he destroys the bridge, sending the creature plunging to its death… despite the fact that it has wings.

This was retracted when a reader pointed out that the wings, like the rest of the beast, were made of shadow and fire and thus would be useless for flight.



{February 14, 2008}   Gentleman Auction House

No, were not really auctioning any gentlemen, because for the life of me, I can’t find any in this little town of mine. *coughs into mic… moves on*

Sorry, that was totally lame. I’ve spent a few moments this morning listening to and looking for more on a band called Gentleman Auction House. If you love Ryan Adams, you definitely need to check out this band because he’s in it. *edit* ok so I learned that it’s a different Ryan Adams. That changes nothing. */edit* If you’ve never heard, or just don’t like, Ryan Adams, then leave here and go listen to him until you love him, and then come back here and we can be friends.

Anyway, I guess they haven’t officially released their EP yet, so we may have to wait till June. In the meantime, give a listen to Book of Matches and Everyone Takes Their Hat Off but You. Love it. Now.

via Posh Mama



{February 13, 2008}   Play-pump

I have a lot of concern for third world countries, especially in Africa. That’s where my heart is. I’ve always said that someday, when my kids are grown and we have some money put away, I will go to Africa and do whatever I can to help fight the Aids epidemic, and fight for the rights of the women and children. Anyway, I found this site a few days ago and I keep finding the video everywhere. This is an awesome way to improve the quality of life for people who need it so much.



{February 13, 2008}   New York, New York

Ok, so I’m not great at updating this blog all the time. I’m a working mom, for heaven’s sake! Gimme a break. Actually, my boss invited me to go to the New York Toy Fair this weekend, and I’ve spent a lot of time gearing up for that. By gearing up, I mean shopping. More to come….



{February 13, 2008}   George Bush Sr. on atheists

I’m currently on a quest to absorb some intelligence. I get plenty from my husband. But I feel kind of like my old Catholic babysitter when she said “my priest tells me all I need to know,” in regards to being asked if she ever read her Bible. I don’t want to be dependent on someone else for my own knowledge. Well, I do, but only to an extent.

I began reading The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins. When I first heard of him, all I knew was that he is an atheist. I saw him for the first time on some political commentary show, one of those satires like the Daily Show. I discounted him as a crazy extremist. But now, reading (or rather, listening) though his book, it puts a different perspective on things. Let me say now that this book will not make me loose my faith. It will educate me on the difference between faith and religion, an on how religion has effect on politics and local, national, and worldwide affairs. At least, that’s what I expect, because that’s what I’ve gotten out of it so far. And I’ve learned quite a bit.

Every once in a while, while reading this book, I’m startled by some things that a Christian leader has said or done, and it angers me a little bit. Like this interview with Gearge Bush Sr.:

Sherman: What will you do to win the votes of the Americans who are atheists?

Bush: I guess I’m pretty weak in the atheist community. Faith in God is important to me.

Sherman: Surely you recognize the equal citizenship and patriotism of Americans who are atheists?

Bush: No, I don’t know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.

Sherman (somewhat taken aback): Do you support as a sound constitutional principle the separation of state and church?

Bush: Yes, I support the separation of church and state. I’m just not very high on atheists.

How totally ignorant is that? Dawkins brought up a great point: Consider replacing the word “atheist” above with words such as “Jew,” “Black,” “Hispanic,” “Muslim,” or even “Christian”? It’s infuriating, isn’t it? Is this perhaps closer to some of England’s history than we want to be, a history of protestant killing followed by Catholic killing, in a vicious cycle? Now don’t get me wrong, I don’t think our nation will come to that. I don’t think we will have an extreme Christian leader who will order the slaughter of all who don’t believe, although we must consider how often that very thing has happened in the history of Christianity. But folks, we have freedom of religion here, in this “great” country. And to me, that means freedom to choose no religion. Do I wish that all people will come to God and have faith? Certainly. But nonbelievers are no less human. They have every right to citizenship, patriotism, and freedom.

Oh, and here’s something that I’ve known for a long time, that puts perspective on our so-called “Christian” nation: Our founding fathers were not Christians, in the modern sense of the word. Some were believers, or theists. Others were faithless Deists Some were even *gasp* atheists.



{February 6, 2008}   It’s just a politically-minded day, I guess

I took this quiz today, and here’s my results. I’m a little surprised that I’m such a Democrat:

“Your score is 7 on a scale of 1 to 10. You are a solid Democrat. You are not as fiercely ideological or uncompromising as others in the party, but nonetheless remain a reliable supporter. If you could have your way, you’d like to see Democrats leaders take a slightly more accommodating approach on certain issues – and dial down some of their nakedly partisan and bitterly divisive rhetoric.”

I also took the Republican quiz, just for kicks. There was a question regarding something Ann Coulter said, and on of the response choices was:

She should be executed in order to physically intimidate right-wing anorexic sociopaths”

I chose that one. Strangely, I’m not too far off from being a Republican:

“Your score is 6 on a scale of 1 to 10. You are a moderate Republican. You agree with Republicans more often than not, but have misgivings about some of their hard-line positions, as well as the direction they are leading the country. You remain supportive for now, but if Republicans keep lurching to the right and taking their cues from religious fanatics and belligerent neocons, you may decide to jump off that crazy train.”

I think I’ll just remain a Libertarian Socialist.



{February 6, 2008}   More on the candidates

My husband came up with these very clever limericks about our candidates:

A GOP candidate, Mitt,
Tied his dog to his car for a bit.
As he drove, to a lad,
his sons all screamed “Dad!
Our rear window is covered in etc.

There once was a govener Huckabee
who said “our campaign’s out of luckabee.
If we hire Chuck Norris,
the kids will adore us!”
But instead they told him to go (get stung by) a bee.

A talented chap named Barack
most certainly knew how to talk
but if there’s a bill
up on Capital Hill
he’s sure to be off of the clock.

A veteran was John McCain
but Ann Coulter thought him insane
so she started hintin’
she’d rather have Clinton
than a liberal fellow again.

The democrat who we call Hillary
is fond of the stocks and the pillory.
“It’s the only way
to keep Bill at bay
and from attempting his willy-nillery.”

There’s this other guy called Ron Paul,
the media ignores him. That’s all.



{February 6, 2008}   Politics

Yesterday was the day for my state to vote. In past election, I admit that I was not well educated. Ignorant of the candidates’ views, ignorant of the state of America, and ignorant of what was really important. I’m happy to say that this time around I was educated. Sadly, not as educated as I should be. But at least I am confident in who I voted for. Who do I want to be our next President? Barack Obama. No, I’m not a Democrat. In fact, I’m a registered Libertarian, and, although I don’t give my full attention to the Libertarian view, I do like the ideas that the party presents. Last week I was telling my husband what my political views were, and he called me a Libertarian Socialist. Whatever that means. And it was not meant to offend me, not was it taken as an offense.

Anyway, I thought I’d comment on something I heard yesterday. There was a YouTube video of some church going woman (I no way will I ever indend to degrade to church goers in general; I am a faithful one myself) who said that she didn’t want a President who would be sworn in on the Koran.

First, I’d like to dispel the thought that all US Presidents have been and/or should be sworn in on the Bible. In fact, Teddy Roosevelt was NOT sworn in on the Bible, but merely with an uplifted hand. Franklin Pierce was not sworn in at all. Now, you can claim that the country was founded on Christian principals, and in a sense you could be right. However, there is freedom of religion in America, and that’s what makes this country great. America is changing, sometimes for the worse and sometimes for the better. Are we sdtill a “Chirstian” country? Were we ever? I’m not so sure. As a Christian, I don’t care if our President a Christian or not. I wouldn’t mind if we had an Islamic president, or an athiest. If we have freedom of religion in America, what will stop the Presidential candidates from also having freedom of religion? I would not take any oath on the Koran, because that’s not where my faith lies. So I will not, under any circumstance, force anyone to take an oath on something that he or she does not put their faith in, even the Bible. It would be a meaningless oath to them, and to the American people.

Having said all of that, every American should know that Barack Obama is a Christian. Why should this matter? Because regardless of whatever division you want to make between church and state, as a Christian man, he will make his decisions based on his faith and his view of America in light of his faith. He was sworn in on the Bible and I trust that he will uphold the principals within.

So if I’m a Christian, why did I vote Democrat? Because I don’t just look at one or two issues. There are more controversies in America than abortion and gay marriage. There is our economy, There’s the war, and foreign policy. There are so many things. Personally, I am for gay rights. Does that make me less of a Christian? I should hope not. If I told my coworkers here in the Bible belt what my beliefs are on gay rights, I would get that concerned look, and maybe be given some pamphlets. Did you know that the same word - “abomination” - is used for gay relationships, as well as eating shrimp? I don’t see many of my seafood-loving, Christian friends forgoing shelled creatures of the deep.

Ok, I’ve gone on some huge tangents. I believe that Barack has the most logical approach to making America a better place. Now, at this point in the elections, all of this may be obsolete soon. Hillary could win. She’s won the larger states, although Barack has won more states. I don’t know how this will work out. But there’s my two-cents worth.

I didn’t intend for this blog to be commentary on politics or religion. I meant it to be about being a working mom. But working moms have a voice, and that’s the whole point. I want my voice heard, and I want to spread the facts so that Americans will not remain in an ignorant state. Are all of my points factual? I hope so, but maybe someone can prove me wrong. If so, good. You’ve made me less ignorant.



{January 29, 2008}   I freaking love this picture

Ok, if you haven’t yet seen icanhascheezburger, where the heck have you been? And if you’re not there every single day like me then, well, you have a life. GIVE IT UP! Because it’s one of the most awesome sites EVAR!

I don’t know why this one makes me laugh so much. Maybe it’s because my husband gives me this look all the time. It makes me laugh every time I see it.



{January 29, 2008}   Incredible images: the circle of life

I happened upon an article in the online Telegraph in the UK with some incredible images of a shark in the middle of his mid-day meal. This isn’t the kind of thing I expected to post on my blog here, but I had to share these. Just so neat.

Photographer Chris Fellows did a marvelous job capturing this set of images, off the coast of South Africa.



et cetera